Rowan Chlebowski, M.D., Ph.D.
Education & Experience
1969 - 1974, Case Western Reserve University, School of Medicine, M.D., Ph.D., Reproductive Biology
1968 - 1969, University of Wisconsin, Developmental Biology
1963 - 1968, Marquette University, B.S., Magna Cum Laude
2017 – present, Research Professor, Department of Medical Oncology & Therapeutics Research, City of Hope, Duarte, CA
2004 – 2017, Senior Investigator, Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute at Harbor-UCLA, Los Angeles, CA
1999 – 2017, Chief, Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
1990 – 2017, Professor of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA
1979 – 1990, Assistant/Associate Professor of Medicine, UCLA, Harbor UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
1976 – 1979, Los Angeles County + USC Medical Center, Medical Oncology Fellowship, Clinical Instructor, Los Angeles, CA
1974 – 1976, Cleveland Metropolitan General Hospital (Metro Health), Residency in Internal Medicine, Cleveland, OH
Research
Lab Members
Awards & Memberships
Awards
2008, Fellow of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (FASCO)
2012, ASCO-American Cancer Society Award and Lecture, 2012 recipient. This special award is presented at the ASCO Annual Meeting to recognize a person who has made a significant contribution to cancer prevention and control, research or practice.
2012, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine Distinguished Alumni Award
2013, ESMO Annual Meeting Presidential Session: Best and Late Breaking Abstracts
2014, NAMS Lippincott/Williams & Wilkins Menopause Journal Best Paper of the Year Award
2014, Thomson Reuters the World’s Most Influential Scientific Minds 2014 and 2015 List (Based on the greatest number of highly cited papers – ranking among the top 1 percent most cited on topic between 2003 and 2014. A total of 14 breast cancer oncologists on worldwide list.)
2015, People for Others Award from the Klingler College of Arts and Sciences, Marquette University, joint award with spouse Joan Chlebowski, M.D.
2016, American Association for Cancer Research 2016 Team Science Award to the Women’s Health Initiative (WHI) Investigators. Dr. Chlebowski is one of 13 named WHI investigator group members.The award recognizes an outstanding interdisciplinary research team for innovative and meritorious science with cancer impact.
2016 , Web of Science Highly Cited Researcher 2016
Memberships
American Society of Clinical Oncology
American Association for Cancer Research
American Society of Preventive Oncology
Publications
ABSTRACT
Purpose
Earlier Women’s Health Initiative Dietary Modification trial findings suggested that a low-fat eating pattern may reduce breast cancers with greater mortality. Therefore, we examined the long-term influence of this intervention on deaths as a result of and after breast cancer during 8.5 years (median) of dietary intervention and cumulatively during 16.1 years (median) of follow-up.
Patients and Methods
The trial randomly assigned 48,835 postmenopausal women with normal mammograms from 1993 to 1998 at 40 US clinical centers to a dietary intervention with goals of a reduction of fat intake to 20% of energy and an increased intake of fruits, vegetables, and grains (40%; n=19,541) or to a usual diet comparison (60%; n=29,294).
Results
In the dietary group, fat intake and body weight decreased (all P<0.001). During the 8.5 year dietary intervention, fewer deaths occurred as a result of breast cancer in the dietary group, which was not statistically significant (hazard ratio [HR], 0.67; 95% CI, 0.43 to 1.06; P=0.08). During the same period, deaths after breast cancer were significantly reduced (HR 0.65; 95% CI, 0.45-0.94; P=0.02) by the dietary intervention. During the 16.1 year follow-up, with deaths after breast cancer also were significantly reduced (HR 0.82; 95% CI, 0.70 to 0.96; P=0.01) in the dietary group.
Conclusion
Compared with a usual diet comparison group, a low-fat dietary pattern led to a lower incidence of deaths after breast cancer.
Chlebowski RT, Anderson GL, Gass M, Lane DS, Aragaki AK, Kuller LH, Manson JE, Stefanick ML, Ockene J, Sarto GE, Ravdin PM, Schenken R, Hendrix SL, Rajkovic A, Rohan TE, Yasmeen S, Prentice RL. Influence of estrogen plus progestin on breast cancer incidence and mortality. JAMA 2010; 304(15):1684-1692.
CONTEXT: in the Women’s Health Initiative randomized, placebo-controlled trial of estrogen plus progestin, after a mean intervention time of 5.6 (SD, 1.3) years (range, 3.7-8.6 years) and a mean follow-up of 7.9 (SD, 1.4) years, breast cancer incidence was increased among women who received combined hormone therapy.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the effects of therapy with estrogen plus progestin on cumulative breast cancer incidence and mortality.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A total of 16,608 postmenopausal women aged 50 to 79 years with no prior hysterectomy from 40 US clinical centers were randomly assigned to receive combined conjugated equine estrogens, 0.625 mg/d, plus medroxyprogesterone acetate, 2.5 mg/d, or placebo pill.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Invasive breast cancer incidence and breast cancer mortality.
RESULTS: In intention-to-treat analyses, estrogen plus progestin was associated with more invasive breast cancers compared with placebo. There were more deaths directly attributed to breast cancer (HR 1.96; 95% CI, 1.00-4.04; P=0.049) as well as more deaths from all causes occurring after a breast cancer diagnosis (HR 1.57; 95% CI, 1.01-2.48; P=0.045) among women who received estrogen plus progestin compared with women in the placebo group.
CONCLUSIONS: Estrogen plus progestin was associated with greater breast cancer incidence. Breast cancer mortality also appears to be increased with combined use of estrogen plus progestin.
BACKGROUND
Following the release of the 2002 report of the Women’s Health Initiative (WHI) trial of estrogen plus progestin, the use of menopausal hormone therapy in the United States decreased substantially. Subsequently, the incidence of breast cancer also dropped, suggesting a cause-and-effect relation between hormone treatment and breast cancer. However, the cause of this decrease remains controversial.
METHODS
We analyzed the results of the WHI randomized clinical trial – in which one study group received 0.625 mg of conjugated equine estrogens plus 2.5 mg of medroxyprogesterone acetate daily and another group received placebo – and examined temporal trends in breast cancer diagnoses.
RESULTS
In the clinical trial, an increase in breast cancer diagnoses was seen in the group receiving estrogen plus progestin over the course of the 5.6 year intervention period. The elevated risk decreased rapidly after both groups stopped taking the study pills, despite a similar frequency of mammography.
CONCLUSIONS
The increased risk of breast cancer associated with the use of estrogen plus progestin declined markedly soon after discontinuation of combined hormone therapy and was unrelated to changes in frequency of mammography.
Chlebowski RT, Blackburn G, Thomson CA, Nixon DW, Shapiro A, Hoy MK, Goodman MT, Giuliano AE, Karanja N, McAndrew P, Hudis C, Butler J, Merkel D, Kristal A, Caan B, Michaelson R, Vinciguerra V, Del Prete S, Winkler M, Hall R, Simon M, Winters BL, Elashoff RM. Dietary fat reduction and breast cancer outcome: Interim efficacy results from the Women’s Intervention Nutrition Study (WINS) J Natl Cancer Inst 98(24):1767-76, 2006.
BACKGROUND: Preclinical and observational studies suggest a relationship between dietary fat intake and breast cancer, but the association remains controversial. We carried out a randomized, prospective, multicenter clinical trial to test the effect of a dietary intervention designed to reduce fat intake in women with resected, early-stage breast cancer receiving conventional cancer management.
METHODS: A total of 2,437 women were randomly assigned dietary intervention (n=975) or control (n=1462). Relapse-free survival was examined using Kaplan-Meier analysis, stratified log-rank tests, and Cox proportional hazards models. Statistical tests were two-sided.
RESULTS: Dietary fat intake was lower in the intervention than in the control group (fat grams/day at 12 months, P<0.001) (corresponding to a statistically significant P=0.005), 6 pounds lower mean body weight in the intervention group. The hazard ratio of relapse events in the intervention group compared with the control group was 0.76 (95% CI, 0.60-0.98, P=0.77 for stratified log rank and P=0.034 for adjusted Cox model analysis). Exploratory analyses suggested a differential effect of the dietary intervention based on hormonal receptor status.
CONCLUSIONS: A lifestyle intervention reducing dietary fat intake, with modest influence on body weight, may improve relapse-free survival of breast cancer patients receiving conventional cancer management.